A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier as well as the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a remarkably publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, search for to make their spouse and children household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Exclusive Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore parts are matter to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially inside a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the right posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Occasions. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which has since grow to be emblematic of your depth of your dispute. These steps weren't just symbolic; they were being intended to Obtain visual evidence on the wall’s place relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from your sea Irish Times claimed, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the h2o for the duration of critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the website turned One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely noted that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall prolonged into a place afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been protected in detail with the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became commonly searched phrases as readers sought to grasp the history and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders need to be granted to halt development pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
At the core of your dispute is often a disagreement above boundaries, setting up Rene Collier compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain the wall, as made, goes outside of what was authorised and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has become referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of setting up files, maps, and disorders hooked up for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've described their extensive-standing relationship to the area as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a pair simply wanting to create a household dwelling in accordance Using the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on the Particular Location of Conservation and say that all functions have been performed based on Specialist tips and accepted options. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, like getting into The ocean for the duration of a storm, never change the underlying information.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how organizing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around construction of wall at coastal web page is becoming a shorthand description for your condition that many observers see as more and more typical. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming additional contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had Formerly been involved in area advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from extremely different Qualified backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have become synonymous with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-substantial water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments and René Collier waded by way of waistline-high water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting the two the Bodily truth of the coastline plus the symbolic nature with the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an excessive technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains unsure. The court need to identify whether or not the wall as built complies with organizing authorization and whether any encroachment into a Particular Spot of Conservation has occurred. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and scheduling disorders. However the human component remains central: neighbours who must live along with each other extended once the lawful fees happen to be paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above development is effective at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation increase beyond that handle. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the significance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how rapidly a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental issues like environmental security and property legal rights are perceived to get at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of all-natural elegance and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partially built, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. Regardless of whether it's going to in the end be altered, eradicated, or concluded as planned will count on the court’s conclusions. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probable continue to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most carefully viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.